BranchCheck · form route review
Workshop registration · demonstration
Checked: 2026-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Source: Synthetic example — not a customer form

6 sections · 8 routes · 3 findings
Must-visit rules: 5. Attendance agreement


1. [REVIEW] This section cannot be reached
No route from the first section reaches this section in the imported structure.

2. [REVIEW] A route can return to an earlier section
Possible loop: 3. Team booking / 1. Registration type. This may be intentional; try the route before sharing.
1. Registration type — Who are you registering? → A team → 3. Team booking
3. Team booking — Ready to continue? → Change registration type → 1. Registration type
1. Registration type — Who are you registering? → A team → 3. Team booking

3. [REVIEW] Your must-visit section can be skipped
A submission route avoids “5. Attendance agreement”. Visiting a section does not guarantee its optional questions are answered.
1. Registration type — Who are you registering? → A team → 3. Team booking
3. Team booking — Ready to continue? → Yes, finish booking → Submit

All routes:
1. Registration type — Who are you registering? → Myself → 2. Your details
1. Registration type — Who are you registering? → A team → 3. Team booking
2. Your details — After this section → 5. Attendance agreement
3. Team booking — Ready to continue? → Yes, finish booking → Submit
3. Team booking — Ready to continue? → Change registration type → 1. Registration type
4. Dietary requirements — After this section → 5. Attendance agreement
5. Attendance agreement — After this section → 6. Final details
6. Final details — End of form → Submit

Scope: structure only, not a live respondent test. A route may be intentional. Answer validation, quiz grading, access settings, uploads, and response data are not audited. Re-export after editing. No findings is not a guarantee that the form is correct.